Local prosecutors and courts have a special obligation to the investigation, investigators, investigative techniques, investigative capacity, but the results with ordinary people feel so much at variance, the general reporters will be able to investigate so many questions, why even have a few off, did not stop?
It is reported that Henan Province Higher People's Court and the Intermediate People's Court yesterday Pingdingshan jointly held a press conference to announce the name of the responsible person accountable, Pingdingshan City Intermediate People's Court vice president, a President and the judge are due to But the retrial has been anticipated, when the fate or building front turning point.
This of course is that people look forward to progress, and Pingdingshan insist Intermediate People's Court after the face their own problems within the system. Last year, Zhao Zuohai wrong case was discovered, Henan Provincial High Court has approved a retrial to correct the case, Zhao Zuohai restored freedom and reputation, a positive compensation, and start the accountability mechanisms. Rapid correction of these practices, but also for other regions of the Court of learning.
As the Judicial Committee of Henan Province Higher People's Court said the notification decision in that case there is a credibility of the administration of justice.
timely correction, accountability, justice quickly rebuild public trust can only make people believe that events can be resolved under the rule of law track. The greatest advantage of this is that the public can see, the event will not become an Now, the judiciary and government, damage the credibility of public authorities the greatest, not even the event itself, but the phase of the retrial in the case can be transparent and accountable, can not get rid of the interference of some interest to achieve a just and fair laws.
I hope the
However, public confidence in justice can not always rely on such a fast error correction mechanisms to rebuild, this premise is a huge reconstruction costs to pay. Should ponder is that justice should be the maximum extent possible the reconstruction of public trust to avoid this, make every case can reflect the course of justice, and can withstand professional scrutiny.
why can legitimately become the court's decision?
In this case, the local prosecutors and courts have a special obligation to the investigation, investigators, investigative techniques, investigative capacity, but the results with ordinary people feel so much at variance, the general reporters will be able to investigations so many questions, why even a few off, did not stop? All of the local judiciary investigation procedures, why not play a role, but more concerned for further instructions. Behind and in many cases of injustice, we often can see, there is such a basic link of Justice and the fatal flaw of the lack of basic professional ethics. So, what are these problems caused? It is more worthy of justice practitioners and managers who think deeply.
the personal freedom of every citizen are cherished, the judiciary must guard these noble values, investigative judgments also more carefully, and then more seriously. Look at the (White with summer)
No comments:
Post a Comment